Skip to content

Conversation

@alehander92
Copy link
Member

we are calling the directly constructed TypeRecord raw here, to preserve backward compatibility: the _type helpers accept a kind and a name for the simpler cases.

We might change that API in the future, as there are possible improvements and reforms to type/values

@alehander92 alehander92 requested a review from nickysn April 4, 2025 12:43
@alehander92 alehander92 self-assigned this Apr 4, 2025
@alehander92 alehander92 added the enhancement New feature or request label Apr 4, 2025
Copy link
Collaborator

@nickysn nickysn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

we are calling the directly constructed TypeRecord raw here, to preserve
backward compatibility: the `_type` helpers accept a kind and a name
for the simpler cases.

We might change that API in the future, as there are possible improvements
and reforms to type/values
@alehander92 alehander92 force-pushed the feat-add-references-and-raw-type-helpers branch from 3920ffe to 0e712b0 Compare April 4, 2025 12:46
@alehander92 alehander92 merged commit c936c89 into master Apr 4, 2025
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

enhancement New feature or request

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants